Upgrade check feature returns false errors in the presence of custom named tables/sequences, if these tables include auto_increment fields and the implementer does not name the tables has "ez"something.
In ezoracle/doc/developer-notes.txt is explained that
Considering that implementers are encouraged to name their custom tables using a sufix that identifies their company, this limitation should not be hardcoded as such.
- create a ezoracle table, named *mytable*, and include an auto_increment field
- upgrade check feature, in admin portal setup tab, will report that the sequence is missing, no matter what how you name it
Until there's an official solution for this constraint, a viable workaround might be:
- name your custom tables ez<something> and the correspondent sequences s_<something>